Iraq’s new prime minister

Adil Abdul Mahdi has now been nominated as the new prime minister by Barham Salih to nominate the cabinet for a month’s vote in parliament. He has several features that interact with him, requiring clever and possibly different considerations.

One of Abdul Mahdi’s most important features is his emphasis on being technocratic. The fact is, though he has a history of membership in the Supreme Council, and there are now interactions between him and this parliament, he has tried to make himself independent and technocratic by going back to the past few years.

Iraq is not in a good position to provide services to the general public. The problems with water and the frequent shortcomings of electricity and corruption in the country’s administrative and financial system, on the one hand, and the widespread wings of the government with the relative end to the security scourges caused by the presence of ISIS in the country, has caused the people of this country to expect A special case of the possible government of Adel Abdul Mahdi.

People’s expectations and Abdul Mahdi’s emphasis on being technocratic will make him more strenuous in addressing the problems of the people, to the extent that he is likely to adjust part of Iraq’s foreign relations to such a necessity. Therefore, the exact understanding of the conditions of Iraq and the principles of Adil Abdul Mahed’s behavior is an indispensable necessity in the current situation to consolidate Iran’s relations with Iraq. Any false prioritization can provide grounds for plotting against the two countries.


Reading out how to harm a community through social networks

I love Facebook, YouTube and Twitter, and now I love Instagram (but very little because it’s not hyperlinks in the content). For many years, there were platforms in which people shared parts of their lives. Later, they became a source of information, a great place to receive daily news. Most of the time we were entertaining, vibrant and had a good social outlet. Can still be But now more than ever, it seems that people use these social networking platforms to spread their thoughts. It’s easy to talk about hate and anger, Christians, radical Islamists, even racism, gender, and homosexuality behind your computer screen, but can you say it aloud? It seems that the position, the fear and the anger, is rather easy, rather than understanding, in today’s atmosphere.

In the current period of Tramp, the discontent of a large group of Americans is very evident. People are hurt, angry and scary. This is a world that does not feel safe. Americans have become Americans. With Donald Trump, the threat of wall construction and the expulsion of immigrants, the protection of people without arms control and the threat of homosexuality and birth control, there are over-hate and anger around us, people are really scary. In addition, people are vulnerable to harm. We are currently living in a state of posttraumatic stress disorder or PTSD, true and experienced or experienced, we are violent, raw and worried. And whenever something new happens, it’s a new catastrophe that wounds reopens. We respond, we retaliate, and often we go to the social media to try, support, and sympathy for ourselves, but most of our threats are in the form of hatred and anger that ultimately throws this society out of intolerance. We’re even loner.

Sometimes we find our allies in social media. Principalists find each other. Reformists find each other. Feminists find each other. Different ethnicities find each other Canadians find each other. Radical feminists find each other, but most of these connections are created at the expense of alienating others, and often those who are very alien are our friends. When we form allies under a very reformist group in social media, we in turn often outsmart friends, neighbors, and family. We start the obvious wars with those who love us and support us, and in turn we create more divisions of unity, where we need support for the treatment of our wounds, we become more distant and more fragile. This is repeated over and over again.

In my career, the fact is well-known that post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is not limited to soldiers returning from the war. In the field of psychology, we realize that PTSD can occur, even if we are watching a news through a shocking or distressing event like this massacre. We also know that PTSD can occur in relationships, such as betrayal and betrayal. PTSD can occur in work, with control, critical partners. The field of PTSD occurs using maladaptive skills in friendships.

So how can we deal with the damage of social media? I sometimes encourage my friends to be separated from the social media. But this is not always possible and in the world many people use social media not only for a social media but for their own business and livelihoods. So the best thing to do is focus more on how to choose on social media.

We must have social media provided this is a relationship with all friends, family, colleagues and, later, some of them. We must practice the same relationship that we practice in everyday life, and most importantly face-to-face. Here’s an example, if you have social activity for 3 hours a week, then put it at a specific time in your social media. The boundaries set for how your relationship with online people is important in your real life. If you spend 5 hours a day on social media, you should spend 5 hours a month on social activities, so you have to check yourself, do you abuse social media to the point where you might be harmed? It’s easy for business, hiring a social media manager. A social media manager sends articles and content, and it’s time for this to be set.

Ultimately, learning the boundaries of personal, social and professional life is key to you, and using it to determine how you engage in social media can be the first step in your recovery from any physical, political or personal injury you may have experienced. .